another fine line you got me into

the line of security verses repression is what I'm talking about.
I'm not sure if it's a bi-polar thing, all these extremes and then the gap where the fine line is.
So today I decided to return to Day 1. What does this mean? This means I have an opportunity to really look at my powerlessness. I cannot afford to be anything but entirely and utterly vigilant. That means being precise about my measurements of my food. Not a little ore or a little less. And every measurement and chosen food item matters. When I allow thins to just go by as if unnoticed this is the slippery slope down. Now I think this is security although at times I can think it's repression, too rigid and rigidity can seem tedious. When I listen to others it can sway me and I can forget the power food can have over me. I can feel so miserable and become suicidal. I feel imprisoned and break free by more eating and for a second I don't give a damn. But then guilt and the shame ensues and I need m ore food to deaden that. This is repression surely.
And all through that "ah! lets get free and easy" attitude. Rebellion? It's not as strong as rebellion I don't think. Rebellion to me is far more forceful and visibly destructive. This is a much quieter form of rebellion. Is there another description for it? A desire for nonconformity. Because conforming seems weak and boring to me. A sheep not a leader. Someone who can't think for themselves. It's also about how other will think of me. This is the mental illness? To think that conforming makes me a weak, pathetic person. How can I let the security of routine just be and it's that security that permits me to be free and creative.
This resonates with the Marcia theory of adolescence and part of the psychosocial identity theory of Eriksson. He talked about identity theories within the stages that Erikkson proposed. There is also a link as I see it with Bowlby's attachment theory. There is this period of adolescence that in my mind is a preparation for moving into adulthood. And within a secure family the adolescent is able to start exploring a broader patch of life, developing ones own network and seeing and experiencing beyond the safety of the home and parents. It's a time of beginning to develop opinions of ones own. I think parents have a difficult time with this as it represents change and change represents loss. My dad for example never seems to deal with this with any of the children he befriends. And he became unbearably controlling when I reached this stage. And of course this has an impact.
In my view this period of growth is to be able to go out and get into scrapes and make mistakes but to be able to come home to the family and address the issues that arise, explore and understand the mistakes and go forth and try again. But if there is dysfunction within the family and too repressive an approach or an attitude of no boundaries, then already the set up is influencing how this period of growth will be affected. For example if parents are too controlling there will be a sense of insecurity - too controlling could be too strict and high expectations with shaming being the way of punishing, even if this all occurs at an unconscious level. So when mistakes happen in adolescence the family home is the last place to go back and review the situation. I think this is where the extended family of the past was a useful resource as well that is missing today. Sometimes it is difficult to talk with parents that might be easier and one removed from over protection with grand parents. Of course I see how over the years there is dysfunction in that. There is imperfection within all humans so of course there will always be dysfunction. But also there are devastating effects of the extended family too. Incest, rape, meanness and so on. We all know the horrors. And entrapment. The roaming families for want of a better term mean that people have had broader experience without the shackles of the extended family. There are pros and cons of course. But if people were to keep becoming more consciously aware of all the interactions, environmental, social, as Sameroff described in the complex Transaction Model of development, then we could all be working towards improvement all of the time. Instead of just trying to get it right I think for me I just need to keep becoming conscious and looking for ways to improve. Perfection is Nirvana and Nirvana is when I die.
So where was I? Way off the track. But along similar parallels. Teh creation of security without repressing. So anyway yes the family duty is to create security without repressing or indeed creating over confidence. Somewhere in the middle is balance. And I never think the fine line is one single line, I think that balance is within a varying amount. In psychological statistics I think that would be the confidence intervals. It's an inference that there is a balance and it differs between individuals sowhere between this and this. So say there is a variotion from 1 to 100, the fine lines or interval of balance between security and repression would perhaps be between 45 and 55. An everyone has to find for themselves where they are within that. And that presents another influential dilemma. The balance interval for onw person maybe different from their own child. So if a parent tries to impose their own balance on another it immediately creates an influence. So how to develop that trust in the Universe to just be there as a support whilst also ensuring there is security throuh boundaries. So long as there is felxibility and not rigidity then all will be well? It's so complex huh!
No wonder I've been baffled recently and prior to my recovery years note ven aware of teh balance intervals. My parents certainly didn;t really show me. I think my mum may have had more of an idea but dad was rigid and controlling for certain, no benefit of the doubt there. However, I can understand more these days and so am more forgiving and less blaming. That's a blessed relief, Thank you God. To be free of that resentment is just freeing beyond anything I could imagine. And hence I think I've found the route through my struggles at work slightly easier and faster to stop and loo at. Yes it's been since January but I'm pleased that it's only May and thigns within me are so different.
And so doors are opening even if they are not all seeming right at this moment. Portsmout, Southampton, even Bognor. I just need to go and explore them. hence I need to complete the application forms.

So with my food it's security for me to follow the precise food plan and trust that the fellowship is working for everyone not destroying them. I see it working. I trust my sponsor through her experience, she is not trying to stifle me, she is trying to help me. And I know that withut that certainty of my food I take advantage. It's the mental illness of wanting more and wanting tings my way and believeing that I can get away with that or this because I can control that. I know from years of experience that I simply cannot control my food at all. I am utterly powerless. So by keeping that absolutely tight, it is possible to have freedom and creativity in other ways. Why on earth would I not want to do that. It's my anger seeping out in a subtle way? Anger becoming control?
I've been angry at work and it's diminished into frustration but when I'm frustrated I can get very stompy footed, and thinking why can't people just do it my way!!?
Plus there's the ongoing insecurity with my finances. It's scary. The future is scary. It's another fine line and balance interval. Living in today and trusting that tomorrow all will be well. But unless I am investing in today then I'm not taking responsibility for tomorrow. Then I think well I could be dead tomorrow so why not spend what I have in today and enjoy it. But then tomorrow I wake up and I've less for that day.
What about having to work forever into my old age, when already I get so tired. But then if I'm doing something I love within an environment I enjoy then I'm not so drained. But what if I'm not doing something I love in an environment I enjoy - well work through it and as I'm seeing doors will open. So long as I keep looking and then filling the other areas of my life with things and people I do enjoy I am getting sustenance enough. I can be content with my best efforts.
I think I'm seeing it. I feel repressed at work but at the same time there is security as I know what I am heading for each day. I'm getting the opprtunity to develop as a person. And when I take on a happy attitude it is actually even fun. After all L and I had a little laugh yesterday afternoon. It was brief and silly but a luagh it was nonetheless. She did a lot of the groups too. So she wants to work like a trooper then that's what she's doing. I don't like working at that pace and get too tired to keep it up. I am taking care of myself by saying so.
It will be an interesting Supervision session as I feel very different. I will listen and observe once again.
So I am at Day 1. This means no eating out for 90 days. That will probably incvenience a few people over my birthday for example but AB already conceded that it's up to me what I want to do for food on my birthday. And she really does not understand the principles I am only just getting to grips with msyelf. Why would she?
Oh we discussed the fine line of telling friends things like they are putting on weight or their behaviour seems out of order. I thin there is a way of doing this. Saying how I feel about someones behaviour is one thing. And then it's up to them whether it is a problem for them or not and want to change.
I have noticed that RB is putting on weight and changing shape. I want to say something but it's difficult. She does not ask for an opinion but when I knew I was putting on weight I didn't want others to say anything. On the otherhand it's the truth and knowing how sensitive she is about eating and size (I believe she's a foody) then it would be helpful. or would it? I am uncertain. I need tot ake this to quiet time. Perhaps the truth is something to be said but to be considerate of the individual involved may mean not saying anything. I am just not sure. Is it any of my business? This is the balance interval of discretion and brutal honesty. In retrospect I am very glad that ML told me about how she felt when I was darkly involved with SL. Darkly I say because it was day and night and then took me into darker arenas within it. I knew there was shame because I was justifying it and keeping activities secret. If my conscience is clear and my motives pure I do not need to hide anything from anyone. But of course there is discretion. An that is something I need to discern by listening to God.
God, please show me what I need to do with this matter of honesty but maintaining a person dignity. This is a part of my job too really. Learning ow to say things to open up the awareness for the person but without being antogonistic and creatign hostility. This is a balance interval that is very valuable and very difficult to attain. It is a gift of God.

As always I welcome any input. I know though only one friend who dips into this Blog. It's a serious matter of learnign about life and people. Yet no one is erading it and so no one is contributing. It's a pity really as there is an entire world of resource out there at my finger tips. All with differing views that could be so useful for me. And no one ever comments. Oh well. I will take these questions I have, with genuine interest and a desire to be better as a person, to God.

Thank you God for the gift of thought and writing to be able to spill all my thoughts out.

Bliss
XX

The fear of cheese

I would very much appreciate your thoughts on my situation regarding food. My sponsor has suggested I take it to quiet time to ask for guidance as to what i need to do.


I think my issue started Tuesday 2 weeks ago. I now have carbs introduced to both lunch and supper. I am weighing myself weekly. And I had put on less than a pound but it really has aroused a lot of disturbed thinking. I'm afraid. Throughout my eating "career" I have had periods of utter control over food intake through starvation. And then also periods of controlled eating that has I believe resembled recovery to me. Since then I tried different ways to just have food as food and eat 3 times a day but always ending up relapsing on sugar and flour products and of course what I realise now, quantity. In my early days with FA I just wanted to lose weight, I was so desperate and low in mood with my size. The weighing and measuring of course worked but also resembled control.

However I have gradually come to accept that I truly need a very clear vision of what is food abstinence and this FA way has been working. of course with the food abstinent and body image in the hands of God, I have need FA support to be able to deal with the day to day issues that arise for me because of life itself. Thank God for fellowship.

Anyhow 2 Sundays ago I had cheese for my lunch. Absent-mindedly I weight out 4 oz. As I sat down to eat I commented to myself that it looked a lot and suddenly I realised I had 4oz instead of 2oz. So there and then I decided to put what looked like 2oz aside. I cannot think what thought process I went through but whatever it was it didn't include getting up and re-weighing the cheese. Laziness? Desire for the cheese?

I have been afraid of cheese and limited it as a protein to once a week maximum. I don't think I'd ever discussed this fully with my sponsor until the last couple of days. Anyway I didn't discuss the incident itself with my sponsor until yesterday. Actually now I'm writing it I am wondering if the increase in weight was last Tues rather than the previous one. I will have to check my log now when I get home.

Anyhow 2 further incidents occurred. One day my protein was just under 4oz. I thought to myself I'd get it made up by the kitchen at work. It was under by about .3 of an ounce if I remember correctly. And then another day my cooked veg was under and I decided it was OK.

I did not check it out with anyone or even mention any of these 3 incidents to my sponsor. But my thinking was whirring. I was thinking so I may lose some weight but it won;t be as a genuine result of abstinence. Then my sponsor might be adjusting quantities based on false information. Then I might put on weight based on all of that nonsense. It really only became clear to me in my quiet time yesterday morning and so I shared it all with my sponsor. With I might add great embarrassment and shame that I had kept it a secret and for the behaviours and thinking.

She has asked me lots of questions that to be honest I am over thinking. I am trying to find rational answers to her questions. I'm just realising this now as I am writing this to you. I do get a lot of clarity through writing.

There is the question of needing to go back to day 1 (another 90 days) as there was an element of me saying "I can't be bothered" when deciding not to re-weigh the cheese, which would have been easy enough. I actually cannot clearly think of the thought process now. I think part of me was thinking "eat it, what the heck" and the other part of me terrified.

90 days involves, not sharing at meetings and listening. I can't think what else it involves. I will need a reminder from my sponsor.

Actually in writing that I can see the powerlessness and at that precise moment there was no acceptance, it was self-will both ways.

Or do I take it as a red alert. Continue as I am but remember why I need to be absolutely precise about weighing and measuring because I am powerless.

I am perfectly content to return to day 1. I will have to shed some pride in my regular meetings and explain my return to not sharing etc. They make judgements against FA for being too controlling etc but this would be my choice and I can easily shrug off their thoughts on this. What matters is that I maintain my abstinence. I do not want to return to being in the craziness of addictively eating. This recovery matters and is my priority.

What concerns me also is that the relief and freedom have received as a result of behaving and thinking differently with the troubling situation at work isn't as pure as it has seemed. Maybe the food element has brought me the relief. However all it feels as if it has brought me is too much time thinking and agonising about it. Which of course takes away from my difficulties.

I can also give myself such a hard time about not getting it right. I feel I've let myself down and my sponsor is now not so pleased with me. I know that's not how it works. I know I am an addict through and through so there will be all sorts of unconscious motives for all of this. I am just not fully aware of the underlying drives.
I can create a drama from absolutely nothing. So I realise by writing that my sponsor is right. I just need to keep taking this to quiet time and trust that I will get some clarity.

Thank you for allowing me to write this all out. It's more of a thought release I suppose. Rather than it all whirring around my mind, it's now all out in type. Thank God for words!


I would certainly appreciate any feedback you might have.

Bliss



XX

By myself

Hmmm I can so Miss Independent ad then recall other times when I've been this independent. Its the Southdown Convention today. I've decided to make my own way there, not arranged to "hook up" with anyone in particular, expecting to see a number of people I know anyway. Now I'm about to leave and recalling other times I've been this independent and felt like I stick out like a sore thumb and a sense that I am obviously clumsy and uncomfortable and needy. When needy people tend to avoid like the plague. Well that's my sense of things. I am a sensitive person and become super alert when I am feeling in danger. The danger is? Well that I'm vulnerable and exposed. people won't like me because I might latch onto them (and have done), that I can be rejected and therefore feel even lonelier and unlikeable. So I'm going along for about 1 1/2 hours. I need to be back here for 11:30 ready for the AWOL at 12:00. Leaving at 09:00 means I will get there for about 09:30. I hope I will be there for D's share. I'm sure to see some familiar faces and get chatting. Knowing how to chat and then move on, such social skills require practise. And what am I moving on to? That's the exposed feeling. Firstly that I feel awkward, cumbersome, wanting to sound interesting and joyful, then not knowing how leave them for fear of sticking out as the LOSER all alone. Yet I like being independent too. I can appear confident even if I am not feeling it inside. At least my size is contributing to my confidence now rather than deflating me.
Does everyone have this fear. It can become such an impending sense of horror that often I just don't bother to show up for things. I've cancelled many an event and with such shame even in relief. Letting people down. This wouldn't be letting anyone down really not to show up but it's the commitment to me and the support of AA. That's the reason I wanted to go in the first place. Just to be a part of it all in my own little way. So off I go. I know where it is at least. And it will probably be easier to park this morning. It's £4.00. I will go along with questions such as - Do you go to many conventions? How do they contribute to recovery do you think? Lots of people speak so positively about conventions and give this one especially a good press. Do you ever get involved in the organisation of them? What's that like?
Yes keep the focus on them - I would like to avoid saying how are you? If I say anything of this vein I would like to ask how the week has been for them?
I can finish off saying, well I'm going to carry on mingling with people now. Lovely to see you and enjoy your day.
How does that sound?
Please God show me the way to be. I'll show up as I have committed to do so and now I need your help. Thank you. Oh and God please make it a successful day and help a newcomer to see the way through. Thank you.
Bliss
XX

The gap between the extremes

Well! Thank you God. It works! It really does.
Since the middle of January I have been agonisingly in agony, troubled to my very core with the changes in my work place. Namely the departure of P and the arrival of L. Such different people. I have been angry, escalating to fury. I know I afraid but often unable to identify this through all the other emotions. I've been confused, discombobulated and disappointed. At times I've been blaming and resentful. My attitude then has been argumentative and distasteful at time. When I lash out my self hatred quickly turns on me and then I resent her even more somehow. I've hated her for making me feel so low and despairing. I've wanted to run. I've wanted to stay in bed, be off sick for weeks on end doing mind numbing things. I've wanted to go to the other extremes of high partying and taking risks. I've become paranoid thinking at times that she's recording us in the office, or at the least able to hear us through her hearing aid connection equipment. I noticed my paranoia had intensified generally, fear spreading. I was becoming more and more uncertain about myself and my skills and abilities. Gradually quietening, having little to say because I thought it was incorrect or inadequate. Inwardly questioning everything about me simply augmenting the already heightened fears.
What have been the fears?
I am never really clear on the fears but I think it starts with me being scared that I'm being found out as incapable and inadequate. And then if that has been discovered I will lose my job. If I lose my job what on earth will I do, how will I get an income? And no income will mean that I won;t be able to afford anything at all, I may even lose my home and end up on the streets. And what about the future? Old age for example, how awful will that be? Not to mention the fears of what my dad will think of me. I want a certain easy life style that actually I already can't afford. I don't like it!!
It's been months of mental agony, turmoil. And it's affected everything. My studies are deferred, my energy levels have been low, my activities have decreased, I've had no clear thinking. Every waking thought has been connected with the struggles.
However, I've stayed abstinent. My food has been clean. There have been a couple of wavers, for example not having quite enough veg or protein and allowing that to go under. I haven't mentioned that to my sponsor. I need to. I can't even remember which days. It was two days during the last week, since putting on nearly a pound in weight the week before. That shook me to the core as well.
I also had the funny situation with cheese last Sunday. I had weighed it as 2 oz but when re-weighing it I got it into my mind that it was 4 oz. It really was a mistake. Only as I was eating it did I realise that there seemed to be so much more cheese than normal. I took a whole heap off my plate but didn't re-weigh it, I assessed it. That threw me a bot. I thought it would make all the difference so I think the drops I permitted, and they were not even entire ounce drops, for example the protein was 0.5, but the whole imbalance had started. I feel dreadful that I haven't told my sponsor. I feel ashamed and afraid. But the reality is that has been the course of the events and the secrecy will be the downfall of the whole thing. I need to become clean and not take things into my own hands.
So apart from this, I've been taking on the suggestions. I've been calling out every day. During the calls I've gone on and on about the situation at work with L and how awful I've felt. I shared the blame and resentment over and over again. Months of it. It's been suggested that I pray for her every morning and every evening. To begin with that was ad hoc but gradually I got into the practise of praying for her to have everything I would desire for myself. And I prayed for her happiness, prosperity and health. I still am praying for that and including my dad and Theresa with the same hopes that God will provide them with the same.
My sponsor kept reminding me that y only job is to maintain my serenity. Yet everyday I was not serene. I was angry and then I would say things that would be antagonistic, not on purpose, but would contribute to the bad feeling between L and I. I was blaming her for making me like that though. I was reminded to step out of self, which I was thinking to stop thinking all the time about me. But I also realised it's stepping out of the feelings. As my sponsor said listen and observe. I would listen for a while and then jump in with an opposing opinion. I would be so scared that I compulsively defended myself by being argumentative, at times gossipping in an attempt to rally allies. I would accuse and blame and resent in my defensiveness. But then afterwards I would really be hating myself for the way in which I had mishandled things. Always taking it on me that there was a horrible atmosphere.
It was said several times over the months that there was evidently an issue between L and I. To begin with I hated being accused of being the problem. That's what I heard. Especially when L said to S that she liked S. She didn't say that to me at all, she only referred to the issues. So I interpreted that immediately that she doesn't like me. Mind you the way I have attacked her at times, it's not surprising and I haven't liked her for the way she has attacked me. Touche.
So very little listening even when I truly intended to. Then suddenly this week, the personality change in me occurred.
I have no idea how the clarity happened apart from a process over all of these past months. Little things drip feeding through, maybe the emotional strain was grinding me down, enough to have to stop emoting. The praying, the growing faith that has been like an engine trying to start. Speaking with other and hearing their experiences. Being listened to and people identifying similarities of attitude, the self-centredness of wanting and needing reassurance, the fears. Praying, praying and praying some more to be shown how to be. Praying for inspirational thoughts for what to do next. Praying.
Tuesday was team meeting day. It was this week wasn't it? Yes it was.
I listened and listened. I listened out in me for the defensiveness but observing when I was about to say but" or become argumentative. When I noticed myself about to do that I stayed quiet even more and listened some more. I had prepared myself somewhat to be able to say tings like "So I think I have understood that ....." And as I did L seemed to be agreeing and even adding to my contribution rather than arguing against it. I suddenly had a real clarity, thank you God for the inspirational and creative thought. When it became clear, and I asked for clarity, that we were not going to be recruiting when A leaves (1 June), I said in that case we need to change the programme to better suit the way L wants the groups to run and to suit the new staffing levels. The problem is she likes working at a high level. When is it a culture of over working when trying to adapt to a number of different people's idea of work levels? Where and what is the gap?
I started to accept that L is the boss for whatever reason. I didn't want the role and whoever would have taken it would certainly bring about changes. It was just that these were so different, a completely different approach to addictions therapy. And done in a way that she seemed to be undermining us, criticising us. When in actual fact she is criticising the programme. But as we have been working and supporting the programme it feels as if she is criticising me. It's so hard to separate the two.
Oh and I was glad, thank you God, to have been given the words when meeting with N, that yes there was/is a problem between L and I but I'm not the only one who is having a similar problem. I didn't say it but I refused to be the scapegoat and I felt good about that.
So in the team meeting, I really stepped aside from self. I out the emotions to one side and therefore didn't need to defend myself. Instead I was protective - there is a fine line, but where and what is the line? Where is the gap between defence and protect?
I continue to be baffled by her seeming chaos. She seems to have no boundaries. IS this true though? They are just different from my own. And are mine too rigid at times? I ask that believing that I d have rigid rules with no flexibility. So where is that gap between differences? What is the gap between a flexible boundary and a rigid boundary. For example when is it right that there are consequences having crossed someones or an institutional boundary. Or should someone simply come to their own conclusions? If there are no consequences do people ever come to their own point of a need to change. You see I think there needs to be some order and boundaries, otherwise there would be anarchy.
So anyhow, she has very different boundaries to my own. It's finding a way to accept that. For instance, she is quiet happy to be late for the group. She walks in sometimes just because she wants to be in a group. It's chaos. She has 1:1's and keeps them waiting. She has little awareness of the staffing levels and does her own things anyway. She doesn't take into consideration others thoughts and opinions and does it her own way anyhow. In my opinion this isn't good management. But you see this is where I have to learn and practise acceptance and tolerance. But where is the gap between accepting and not being taken advantage of? What is the gap between acceptance and it not being conducive to good practise? Isn't it all a matter of opinion? How do we begin to negotiate on that.
In terms of the daily practise I can see how the morning group can be very useful in letting the clients just bring to group their own thoughts and topics and discuss them at whatever level. They don't get to the nitty gritty quickly but they work to some level. And then if we can have more time for 1:1 therapy sessions and use the other groups for therapy and information, I can see that a reshaped programme can incorporate everything. It will be less directive and this is something I've always questioned anyway. Interesting how my values can shift to follow people that I think are better than me.
I still do question her rationale that people should be closed down when raising issues such as abuse. I remember this happening to me and the focus being brought back to the addiction. It wasn't helpful I don't think. At the same time I can see her point. But if the therapists can have a part in containing the situation and I think we always have done, then there is a therapeutic value in that. She is saying that it shouldn't be raised and only dealt with in a1:1 therapy session, preparing the person to be with the emotions and then having perhaps a separate abuse group. I think that would be helpful in addition. But this is where we have to agree to disagree. She won't agree to disagree but I can. Once again she is the boss for whatever reason you've decided that God. And what do I know really? What do any of us know really. Nothing is proven to be 100% proof. People still go away traumatised, all we can do is be there to support them when they need someone to turn to. Developing the trust is the key thing here. Knowing that someone is listening and won't abuse them or re-traumatise them. Trust, trust, trust. She does it her way and I do it mine.
I think I have made some mistakes as in strongly pushing C to reveal all to the group. I think the group were quite troubled when J revealed the details of her mums murder. It was difficult to hold the entire groups emotions and trauma with that but in 1:1's Julie became more trusting over time.
There is no right and wrong way, just ways. How I deal with other peoples way is the key to me maintaining my serenity.
I think there is a lot of growing here. Where is the gap though between staying and going? Where is the gap between listening to fear of starting up my own practise and thinking this is God's way of telling me not to do it. Or is it fear blocking me? God please give me an inspirational thought.

Oh and I was honest with my sponsor about the self-will and food this last week. The protein and veg under weighing was worked through. B did ask me to take some quiet time with God to think about the cheese. What did I do with the cheese? Did I take this into my own self will God?
I think I'm scare she will say I can't have cheese at all. That's my fear now. And I've been so pleased not to have it more than once a week. I like cheese. Do I have a relationship that is unhealthy with cheese God?
B mentioned day 1. I'm not afraid of going back to day 1 at all. Another 90 days of listening during meetings. But there are some measures I can take to be more careful to be precise with weighing and measuring - 1 keep the book with me, try to have protein pre-prepared during the week just in case it's under and the same with cooked veg, although B mentioned popping a tomato or something into the microwave if it happens again. I can also tell her as soon as it happens.
I think with the food it's fear of it being taken away from me. And yet this is my choice. I like cheese and it's OK to like certain foods. I have in the past binged on cheese this is true and I know to be very careful with it. Hence I don't have it more than once a week. There is also a fear that if I have it too often it will be too much fat in my diet and then I'll start putting on weight. So it is a food type I am cautious about. Is this self-will God? What do I need to do about this? I will keep asking until there is clarity. I will share my questions with FA people. Non-fa'ers are bound t thin this is faddish or over complicated. What they don;t have to worry about is that food can take me into insanity. So keeping things straightforward with my food will make living life simpler, even when it's troubling.

Bliss
XX

On being alone - Ascension day

I loved hearing this yesterday morning. It was a moment of reflection on the matter of aloneness. I resonated strongly with that inner peace of aloneness but was also reminded how much of my time I have rebuked that notion and despaired for someone to fill what can feel like a chasm. The work in progress is how I am a little more comfortable with aloneness and less lonely. The longing diminishes ever so slightly. Thank you God. I suppose, according to the story of Jesus of Nazareth, the misunderstandings and inexperience are essential. I try to reconcile why? Why did God not give all knowledge from the offset, do away with pain and difficulties from the very beginning. Is this though the spiritual growth, the journey, the river, the road to Nirvana or Ascension? Our personal evolutionfrom undeveloped brain to eventual all knowledge at death. That makes sense to me since learning knowledge about development of humans and the brain.mans have developed areas of the brain beyond those of other creatures. We have technically the same brain stem as that of ancient species such as the crocodile. But we have also evolved beyond that. The miracle. God's gift? Chicken and egg, what came first? Did something kick in meaning we could consciously start experiencing so that we could then develop brain to create more room for conscious experiences? With consciousness comes misunderstandings or confusions and a desire to know more and so more experiences bringing more misunderstandings.

For whatever reason I am where I am in the greater scheme of the Universe. It feels very difficult and frightening when I don't understand and don't know what to do or how to be. But my faith is growing. Especially as I learn how to do things differently and feel the serenity coming back. And in my aloneness I am certainly experiencing life. What is wonderful is that I can share my misunderstandings and inexperience with friends like you and draw from your experience and thoughts. Then my aloneness can remain as bliss and peace and loving and truthful and wise. The pain of loneliness is removed and with it fear can go too.

I embrace being alone more and more but love that we are alone all together. Thank you for being a part of my togetherness, my experience and my misunderstandings.

"When I walk my dog early in the morning in the park, there are very few other people about. A few joggers, other dog walkers, the odd party goers recovering from a heavy night.
On Sunday morning though, I found myself surrounded by 15,000 people in pink who had taken part in a moonlit marathon walk in aid of a breast cancer charity. For me, it was the beginning of my day; for them it was the end of an arduous but by the looks of it enjoyable fund raising walk through the night. The sense of solidarity was palpable; women and men congratulating each other, relieved, emotional, some with the picture or the name of the person they were remembering on their tee-shirts.
Coming together and doing something is a powerful way of facing some of life’s toughest circumstances. In the midst of illness, bereavement, addiction or debt, meeting others and communicating with them about how it feels, what it’s like, for many is a step forward in a situation that is frightening and debilitating.

In the current economic circumstances, painful stories are emerging about people feeling acutely lonely against a high background count of anxiety about how to pay the next bill; hearing endless worrying news about Greek debt, banks not lending enough to small businesses and the stubbornly rising youth unemployment that threatens a European generation. The solidarity provided by food banks, debt counselling groups and night shelters in these circumstances can be a lifeline when you realise it’s not just you.
But today Christians face another equally profound truth; that while of course we are interdependent on one another and on the planet’s resources; while we unavoidably live in community, there is always a part of us that lives inside, alone. Today is Ascension Day; the poetic, sometimes comically portrayed way that the Bible has of saying that Jesus of Nazareth doesn’t stay around forever – but leaves; leaves his companions to get on with it, with all their misunderstandings and inexperience. That small group of men and women changed the world.
There is a paradox about Ascension Day which is to say that one of the most powerful ways of combating the loneliness of isolation is to make our peace with the fact that we are, in common with everyone else, alone. There are unfathomable depths within you and me; wisdom that has come with the years, resilience that has grown with our experience. It may seem unrealistic to talk about hopeful determination when there is so much to feel anxious about. But Ascension Day suggests that it is possible to find when we have made our peace with God in the reality that we live together alone."

Wisely using courage to remain wholesome

Knowing when to walk away is wisdom
Being able to is courage
Walking away with your head held high is dignity.

I am hoping God will help me to be wise, courageous and dignified. Please show me what, how and when I need to do whatever it is You would like me to do.

Bliss
X

Lucian Freud

Martin Gayford
(art critic)


It is my intention to include portraits that I actually saw.

A journey to London by train and a walk around the Lucian Freud Exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery was a lovely time spent. I realised only later when discussing the exhibition that I hadn't had any strong desires to possess any particular piece of work. Interesting. As usually there are several that I just want to have with a longing.
Discussing this with A and B, after B asked whether we liked the exhibition or not was interesting in itself. I''m really not sure if I did like it. I found it interesting. I did like the way he captured Kitty, his first wife but I felt it was very much more symbolic. The way she was holding the cat b y the neck was somewhat disturbing and the flowers seemed t have more meaning. The cat looks at us whilst Kitty looks at something else and she seems to be throttling it.The way he paints eyes is seemingly over exaggerated. It's very much more representational than likeness.

Perhaps because I've seen it so often, this is one of my favourites. I find it unusual how there are some specifics within any painting that he seems to pay a lot of attention to, almost getting it accurate and yet other elements are almost cartoon-like. My gosh! Wouldn't he have hated that? Or would he.


A commented that his paintings were as if abstract using the human form to convey the abstract. If she kept that in mind she went on to say, she could really enjoy them. There were paintings that I could agree with an earlier comment of hers, that they looked like dead pieces of flesh. After all he was concentrating on flesh and bodies. Did anyone ever say that he was trying to get to the emotion and soul? No. It was the outer parts he was concentrating on surely. And apparently his daughters have said that he was distant - a remote island. I wonder when he closed down? I wonder what caused him to distance himself from people? ow true is the hearsay anyway? Wouldn't it have been good to have had some time to get to know him and his thoughts on life, the planet, the universe and everything.


 An early self portrait in which he was holding a feather and other symbolic shapes and figures, which had meanings but that he never revealed to anyone.

According to others, the Queen did  not like the version of herself painted by Freud. It's hardly flattering so I can't say I blame her. I wonder if it was destroyed?








I felt as if I was at the scene of a murder enquiry when I looked at this one. The floor seemed to be very alive, the body not.



I loved this painting of Caroline Blackwood. Apparently she was the woman who his heart was broken over. And this painting shouts emotions despite his apparent lack of ...

Something I fund disturbing was the use of his daughters in paintings of nudity. It just doesn't seem OK but that's probably my own personal influences at play.

Bella Freud


This painting of his children was intriguing, the play on perspectives especially the hands and feet. Even the children seem out of perspective with each other. The woman I think is a lover at that time. Why is it artists think it's OK to have many lovers and partners. It seems so painful to me. But to be bohemian means that one would have to accept it? They were and probably still are still the same?? Or am I cynical. I suppose that the relationship between the artist and the model is pretty intense. However apparently his paintings took many long hours with him requiring his models to go into an inner state. He painted them as if they were shut down and deadened. Is this what he wanted? However in this painting of his children there is life and movement, despite the oddness of enlarged hands and feet.




The detail of the man in the foreground is painting exquisitely in my opinion. His suit, his hands. And the view through the window is very detailed and precise. But the guy standing seemed as if at some point he got bored and just bodged it. Apart from the hand in the tail of the suit. I liked that once A pointed that out.

There were so many paintings, a large collection being exhibited. I was chronologically displayed.
I think it took about 2 hours all in all. So worthwhile. I'm glad I went to see it. At this moment I'm not sure what I have taken away from the experience. I learnt more again about him, art and little details.

In English, the borrowed Italian word impasto most commonly refers to a technique used in painting, where paint is laid on an area of the surface (or the entire canvas) very thickly, usually thickly enough that the brush or painting-knife strokes are visible. Paint can also be mixed right on the canvas. When dry, impasto provides texture, the paint appears to be coming out of the canvas.

It was lovely spending the afternoon with A and B. I think it was useful starting out this long weekend doing something away from work. However, they insist on speaking about the situation. As they do about my food. They and others seem to have more problems dealing with what I can't have than I do. I am so relieved to have freedom with my food. I am grateful for the structure and certainty. This used to be so out of control and I was terrified of that. It was not getting better either, it was worsening. Now though I know what and when precisely I will be eating. Today I have eaten more cheese than I am supposed to. I weighted 2 oz but then as I was re-weighing it I was thinking 4 oz. I noted to myself that it seemed so much more than usual. But having sat down and started to eat it I suddenly realised it should be 2 oz. I stopped eating it but think I have probably eaten over the 2oz permitted. Of course now I am feeling fat which is all in the mind. I will tell my sponsor in the morning.

Thank you Lucian for painting. Thank you collectors for allowing the viewing. Thank you National Portrait and curator for organising the event. Pity I have to pay when I am so poor. However I am grateful for the experience as I love the stimulation. I didn't feel exhausted afterwards as I easily made the meeting and despite it not being such a laughter-filled meeting it was meaningful and helpful.
I need to call a few people I think.

Bliss
XX